Skip to main content

Legal Case Presentation

Default Learning Criteria

Updated over a month ago
  1. Structured research narrative with a defined problem, governing standards, analysis, and takeaway.

  2. Precise, concise language that the audience can easily follow.

  3. Emphasis on reasoning and key decision points in the method, not a chronological play-by-play.

  4. Professional delivery with appropriate tone and pace.

  5. Clear signaling of main points and smooth transitions between sections.

  6. Translation of legal research into accessible, plain language with minimal jargon.

  7. Focus on information most relevant to the client’s decision-making, with extraneous detail minimized.

  8. Ethical awareness shown by noting limits, uncertainties, and when further inquiry is warranted.

  9. Concise, accurate, and persuasive use of legal authorities and sources.

  10. Explanation of the significance of cited authorities or evidence, not mere citation.

  11. Anticipation of likely client criteria and concerns, addressed proactively.

  12. Integration of findings into a coherent resolution rather than a list of points.

  13. Use of comparisons, analogies, or other explanatory tools to solidify understanding.

  14. Sustained focus on the defined legal issue without tangents.

  15. Clear closing recommendation or next step that leaves a memorable takeaway.

Did this answer your question?