Skip to main content
Learn about collaboration

Work together with your team

LaiYee H avatar
Written by LaiYee H
Updated over a year ago

Collaboration enhances the depth and reliability of insights derived from qualitative data. By combining diverse perspectives, collaboration enables groups to better understand their findings.

It's helpful to decide on your collaborative approach. This determines how to set up your project. Three helpful approaches to collaboration are split coding, consensus coding, and peer debriefing. Each approach can be used separately or in combination with one another.

Split coding: each person analyses a different transcript

Split coding is a time-saving approach. By assigning each transcript to a different person, you can complete your analysis more quickly, but you may miss deeper insights. Learn how.

Consensus coding: each person codes the same transcript and compares

With consensus coding, you gain overlapping viewpoints and perspectives. This method is more rigorous but also more time-consuming. Learn how.

Peer debriefing: one person analyses and another person reviews the work

Peer debriefing is commonly used by students who analyze data and have their advisor review their work. Learn how.

Did this answer your question?