Skip to main content
Present your GHG report internally

This article provides a script that should be personalized when presenting your carbon assessment to your company

Riane avatar
Written by Riane
Updated over 2 months ago

You have received your GHG report and are ready to present it internally. To help you in that presentation, we have created slides that you can choose according to the time you have. The more stars are on a slide, the more important the slide is.

1. Business Context 1–2 minutes ⭐⭐⭐

Make this introduction short and impactful. Your auditorium needs to know why the company has decided to do its carbon assessment. Key questions may be :

1.1 Why did we conduct this carbon assessment?

  • Was it to better understand our environmental impact, comply with regulations, or align with corporate sustainability goals?

  • Is it part of a broader corporate social responsibility (CSR) or environmental, social, and governance (ESG) strategy?

1.2 Is the assessment compulsory or voluntary?

  • Is the company required to complete this assessment due to legal or regulatory obligations (e.g., local or international emissions reporting standards)?

  • Is this assessment part of a voluntary commitment to sustainability, such as achieving net-zero goals or improving the brand reputation?

1.3 What specific goals or drivers led to the assessment?

  • Is the company aiming to reduce costs through energy efficiency?

  • Is the company responding to investor or customer demand for sustainability?

  • Are there industry benchmarks the company is striving to meet?

1.4 How does this assessment align with our overall business strategy?

  • Is it connected to growth, innovation, or market differentiation?

  • Does it reflect your company's commitment to long-term sustainability and risk management?

2. Impact of Climate Change on the Company - 5 minutes

2.1 Why We Care About Climate Change as a Company ⭐⭐

As a company, addressing climate change is not just a matter of corporate responsibility, but a critical factor in ensuring long-term business resilience and sustainability. Climate change scenarios project a range of temperature increases, each with significant consequences for the global economy and the environment.

Climate Change Scenarios

The Paris Agreement aims to limit global warming to well below 2°C (WB2) above pre-industrial levels, with efforts to cap the rise at 1.5°C. Achieving these targets would significantly reduce the worst effects of climate change. However, current trajectories suggest that without significant action, global temperatures could increase by 3°C or more, leading to severe and potentially irreversible impacts.

At 1.5°C, the world will still experience more frequent extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and shifts in ecosystems, but these risks remain somewhat manageable. Beyond 2°C, the likelihood of catastrophic climate events, such as widespread droughts, floods, and economic instability, increases drastically, which could have severe consequences for businesses and society as a whole.

2.2 Physical Risks and Constraints ⭐⭐

Physical risks refer to the direct impacts of climate change on a company’s operations, assets, and supply chains. These can include:

  • Acute risks like extreme weather events (floods, hurricanes, wildfires) that can damage infrastructure and disrupt operations.

  • Chronic risks such as rising sea levels, temperature shifts, or changing precipitation patterns that can affect long-term productivity, resource availability, and asset values.

💬 Add example if you are directly concerned by these risks.

2.3 Transition Risks and Opportunities ⭐⭐

Transition risks arise from the shift to a low-carbon economy. As governments and industries transition to more sustainable practices, businesses face risks such as:

  • Regulatory changes, where new policies (e.g., carbon pricing, stricter emissions standards) could increase operational costs or demand compliance.

  • Market shifts, where consumer demand leans towards sustainable products and services, making it crucial for businesses to adapt.

💬 Add an example if you are directly concerned by these risks.

2.4 Set a course for Net Zero ⭐

Several regulatory frameworks are designed to help companies reduce their carbon footprint and work towards achieving net zero emissions by 2050.

Recently in the European Union, there was a lot of talk about the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) extending reporting requirements for large companies and listed SMEs. This directive requires detailed disclosures on carbon footprints, climate-related risks, and opportunities, thereby aligning corporate practices with the EU's climate targets. By expanding and enhancing sustainability reporting, the CSRD supports the broader goal of achieving net zero emissions by 2050.

These regulations are integral to driving corporate accountability and ensuring that companies actively work towards reducing their carbon footprints. Compliance with these mandates not only aligns companies with global climate goals but also helps them manage risks and seize opportunities in the transition to a net-zero economy.

2.5 Solving the Climate Equation

The Climate Equation is a virtuous circle that helps companies manage their environmental impact through four interlinked steps: measure, reduce, remove, and report.

First, we measure: We start by assessing our carbon footprint to understand our current emissions. This gives us a clear baseline.

Then, we reduce: Using the insights from our measurements, we work on cutting out emissions. This involves improving energy efficiency, adopting cleaner technologies, and making more sustainable choices.

Next, we remove: For the emissions that can’t be fully eliminated, we invest in carbon removal strategies, such as supporting projects that capture and store carbon, like reforestation.

Finally, we report: we regularly share our progress and results. Reporting keeps us transparent and accountable, showing our commitment to reducing our environmental impact.

This cycle of measuring, reducing, removing, and reporting creates a continuous improvement loop, helping the move towards a more sustainable and responsible future.

3. Methodology of the carbon assessment - 5 minutes

Only if your listeners are not sure to know the different scopes.

3.1 Carbon accounting methodology ⭐⭐

The three scopes of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, categorize emissions based on their sources:

  1. Scope 1: Direct Emissions These are emissions from sources that a company directly controls. Examples include emissions from fuel combustion in company-owned vehicles or on-site energy production (e.g., natural gas boilers, generators).

  2. Scope 2: Indirect Emissions from Purchased Energy These are emissions generated from the production of electricity, heat, or steam that a company purchases and consumes. Although the company does not produce these emissions directly, they are responsible for the energy use.

  3. Scope 3: Indirect Emissions from Value Chain These are all other indirect emissions that occur both upstream and downstream in a company’s value chain. Examples include emissions from suppliers, business travel, transportation, product use, and waste disposal. Scope 3 often represents the largest portion of a company’s total carbon footprint.

💬 Add example of your own scope emissions.

3.2 Emissions computation ⭐⭐

When conducting a carbon footprint assessment, two primary methodologies are used to quantify emissions: Monetary Analysis and Activity-Based Analysis. Each approach has its strengths and is suited for different contexts.

1. Monetary Analysis (Spend-Based Approach)

  • Method: This approach estimates emissions based on financial expenditure data. It links the amount of money spent on goods and services to average emissions factors for each sector.

  • How It Works: The company calculates the emissions by multiplying the amount spent on a product or service by a sector-specific emissions factor (e.g., $100 spent on electricity × emissions factor for electricity production).

  • Advantages:

    • Easier to implement when detailed data on physical activities (e.g., fuel consumption, travel distance) is not available.

    • Can quickly provide a rough estimate of emissions for procurement, supply chains, or services.

  • Limitations:

    • Less accurate than activity-based analysis because it uses average emissions factors that may not reflect the exact carbon intensity of specific activities or regions.

    • Does not capture variations in supplier-specific emissions performance.

2. Activity-Based Analysis (Process-Based Approach)

  • Method: This approach quantifies emissions based on specific physical activities and data, such as fuel consumption, electricity use, or transportation distances.

  • How It Works: Emissions are calculated by multiplying the activity data (e.g., liters of fuel consumed, kilometers traveled) by the appropriate emissions factor (e.g., kg CO2 per liter of fuel).

  • Advantages:

    • Provides more precise and detailed emissions estimates, as it is based on actual activity data.

    • Captures the impact of specific operational practices, energy efficiency measures, and location-specific factors.

  • Limitations:

    • Requires more detailed data collection and is often more time-consuming.

    • May be difficult to implement in areas where activity data is hard to obtain (e.g., indirect suppliers).

Choosing Between the Two:

  • Monetary Analysis is ideal for a quick, big-picture assessment or when detailed activity data is unavailable.

  • Activity-Based Analysis is more accurate and preferred for comprehensive, granular reporting.

In practice, companies often use a combination of both methods to balance accuracy and practicality, applying activity-based analysis where possible and monetary analysis for broader categories like service purchase.

Highlight your percentage of activity data achieved during the year, and congratulate the team for the data collection.

3.3 GHG emissions assessment scopes ⭐⭐⭐

Remind shortly the perimeter and the year of the assessment. Explain what data you used for the activity-based analysis.

4. Presentation of the results - 20 minutes

Present your overall carbon footprint and break it down by category. Make sure your auditory understands the most significant sources of emissions and their impact.

4.1 Executive summary ⭐⭐⭐

This slide offers a summary of your progress and outlines the forthcoming steps in your climate strategy.

To date, we have successfully launched the project and completed the initial phase of data collection. This has provided us with valuable insights into our current emissions profile.

Moving forward, the next steps will involve developing a comprehensive climate strategy based on the data that we have gathered. This strategy will focus on addressing the most significant areas of emissions and setting clear targets for reduction. We will also establish a process for ongoing follow-up to ensure that we are making steady progress and adjusting our approach as needed.

You can now review the initial results, which reveal that scope 3 (adjust to your emissions) is the main source of the emissions.

Let's take a closer look to understand the factors underlying our emissions.

4.2 General overview - Results by activity ⭐⭐⭐

Understanding emissions by activity is essential for identifying the key sources within the company. From the data, we see that Service Purchases account for the largest share, representing 35% of total emissions. This is followed by Digital at 30%, Product Purchases at 20%, and Travel at 10%.

To put this into perspective, our total emissions of 975 tons of CO2e is equivalent to 541 round trips between Paris and New York or the annual emissions of 103 French residents.

Going forward, we will concentrate on these four main activities to pinpoint the exact sources of emissions and begin exploring potential reduction strategies.

4.3 Focus per activity ⭐⭐⭐

For each slide focused on a specific activity, start by reminding your audience of how much that activity contributes to your total emissions. Break down the emissions by their main categories, providing details on key sources. To add depth and relevance, incorporate business insights—such as mentioning specific suppliers or key decisions made during the year that may have influenced the emissions. For example, if the company launched a major advertising campaign, highlight how that impacted the carbon footprint.

Once your audience has a clear understanding of the emission sources, introduce relevant reduction actions for that activity. These actions will provide a roadmap for mitigating the impact and can be discussed in greater detail during the next part of the meeting. This approach ensures a smooth transition from understanding the problem to actively addressing it.

4.4 Focus on building ⭐⭐

Present this slide if it applies to your company: If you have operational control over your buildings, you have the ability to actively reduce emissions from electricity and heating, which likely make up a significant portion of your overall emissions. This is especially important if you manage multiple buildings with varying levels of energy efficiency. By addressing these discrepancies, you can implement targeted actions—such as improving insulation, upgrading to energy-efficient systems, or adopting renewable energy sources—to significantly lower your carbon footprint.

4.5 Focus on employee ⭐⭐

Present this slide if it is relevant to your company: If you want to highlight employee engagement in the carbon reporting process, particularly a high participation rate (or the opposite highlight a lack of interest), this is important as employee activities may represent a significant portion of your emissions. Recognizing strong involvement reinforces the collective effort towards sustainability, while addressing lower engagement can identify areas for improvement in reducing emissions tied to employee actions.

5. Focus on Action Plans - 20 minutes

Introduce your climate ambition and outline the proposed reduction actions. Engage your audience by encouraging them to share their thoughts and perspectives, ensuring that everyone is included in the conversation. This will foster collaboration and help identify potential opportunities or challenges, making the climate strategy more effective and well-rounded.

5.1 Implementing effective reduction actions ⭐⭐⭐

Now that you have presented the emissions data, it’s time to introduce reduction actions. To align with global climate goals, it’s crucial to remember that emissions need to decrease by 3 to 7% annually. The exact reduction target depends on your sector and ambition, whether you’re aiming for well below 2°C or the 1.5°C threshold. For more guidance, check out our article "How to Define Your Climate Goals?"

To achieve these targets, it’s essential to communicate results effectively, engage your team, and raise awareness. A successful climate strategy depends on collaboration across multiple stakeholders, and you’ll need everyone on board to ensure its success.

For each action, Greenly recommends being both ambitious and realistic: if an action is feasible, aim to implement it fully. Actions should be designed to have a meaningful impact on your emissions in both the short and long term, ensuring lasting progress toward your climate goals.

5.2 Reduction actions ⭐⭐⭐

Based on your remaining time, aim to present at least three key reduction actions. Focus on actions that will have the most significant impact on your carbon footprint, offer quick wins, or address areas that raised the most questions during the emissions presentation. For each action, briefly explain what it entails, which emissions it targets, and invite discussion with key questions:

  • Has your company already considered this action?

  • Do you foresee any constraints or opportunities?

  • Which department do you envision taking charge of this initiative?

Example Action: Eco-Driving Courses

Presentation:

Eco-driving promotes fuel-efficient and socially responsible driving practices, which can reduce fuel consumption, lower GHG emissions, and improve road safety. Techniques include starting and accelerating smoothly, and voluntarily reducing speed. For instance, reducing speed from 130 km/h to 110 km/h can cut fuel consumption by 20%.

Business Insight:

Fuel-related emissions account for 10% of our overall footprint, primarily driven by the sales team’s travel to meet clients. Implementing eco-driving could be a cost-effective way to reduce emissions and could be incorporated into our internal training programs. Additionally, we could consider introducing a company-wide speed limit policy after raising awareness of the climate impact of business travel.

Discussion:

  • What are your thoughts on this initiative?

  • Do you see any potential challenges or benefits?

  • Which department would be best suited to lead this effort?

By framing each action with context and encouraging feedback, you’ll create a more engaging and productive conversation around your reduction strategy.

6. Conclusion - 3 minutes

Conclusion ⭐⭐⭐

As we near the end of the presentation, it's important to recap the key points. Remember the scale of your company's emissions and that the majority fall under Scope 3, making it crucial to address these emissions by actively engaging both your service providers and employees.

For the next steps:

  1. Enhance Data Precision: In your next report, aim to improve the accuracy of your emissions data, particularly for any activities that couldn't be measured with activity data this year.

  2. Develop a Climate Strategy: Set clear reduction targets and begin implementing actions to reduce emissions.

  3. Engage Stakeholders: Involve your suppliers and employees in your climate efforts, ensuring that your entire ecosystem is aligned with your goals.

  4. Communicate: Share your climate actions and progress with stakeholders and clients, maintaining transparency and building trust.

  5. Consider Carbon Sequestration: If applicable, contribute to carbon sequestration projects. It’s recommended to allocate 10% of your emissions to offsetting after defining and quantifying your reduction actions.

Finally, thank your audience for their attention. Please refer to the "What's Next" slides for any questions or clarifications about the upcoming steps.

Did this answer your question?