Skip to main content

LiftGPT Workshop: Training & Q&A with Robert Wensley - October 14, 2026

A hands-on LiftGPT workshop: how to think about ARV and comps like a pro, plus two live deal analyses - a subject-to wrap and a Florida flip - and attendee Q&A.

Written by Lais

Robert Wensley turned this week's call into a hands-on LiftGPT workshop: a short lesson on how to think about underwriting, followed by two live deals analyzed with attendees and open Q&A.

The mindset shift: underwriting isn't about picking one number. Robert's point is that ARV is a spectrum of outcomes that depends on what you do with the property, and the biggest assignment fees come from spotting the highest-value use, not just comping the house as it sits. Examples covered include knocking down and rebuilding on an existing foundation, adding a pop-top or basement, and adding an ADU.

What we covered:

  • Why ARV should be treated as a range, and how LiftGPT shows a distribution curve instead of a single number

  • Why the headline ARV is set at the 70th percentile of that curve: fixed-up properties typically sell about 5-20% above the median price per square foot

  • Why older comps can still be useful if you time-shift them for market movement, and how LiftGPT looks at every nearby transaction, adjusted for beds, baths, square footage, and sale date, rather than a handful of comps

  • How price point affects wholesaling economics: higher price points mean higher cost per lead and lower lead-to-deal conversion, while lower price points mean smaller fees for the same amount of work

  • Live deal #1 (San Antonio, TX): a subject-to property with a 2.6% loan, analyzed across selling, renting, lease-to-own, and a wrap with owner financing - the wrap came out as the strongest exit

  • Live deal #2 (Palm Coast, FL): a cosmetic flip analyzed with an ARV range, rehab estimate, max offer at 12% and 2 points, rental comps, market trends, and permit history - including why the seller's ARV looked too high

Tips for getting more out of LiftGPT:

  • Tell it your real numbers (cost of capital, points, vacancy) and ask it to save them to memory, so every later analysis uses your assumptions

  • Ask for short answers if the full analysis is too long - for example, "give me the cliff notes of your last response"

  • Upload inspection reports or contracts directly into the chat so the analysis reflects the actual scope of work

  • Use the ghost icon next to the submit button for an incognito chat that isn't used for training

  • If a result looks off, give it a thumbs down and use the feedback button - the team reviews these to improve the tool

Coming up, as discussed on the call: selecting specific comps on the map and having the numbers recalculate, highlighting as-is purchases versus fixed-up flips on the distribution curve, deeper scenario analysis, scheduled searches across Investorlift inventory, and a connection with the new God Mode.

🎬 Watch the replay and see it in action:

Did this answer your question?