Skip to main content

Release notes for 12 June, 2024

A list of all new content added to LawVu in release 438

Christy Cortez avatar
Written by Christy Cortez
Updated over 10 months ago

Bugfixes:

  • During internal testing, when a client sent a request to an LSP to add a new user and the request was pending, they couldn't send another request.

  • When performing internal testing of the conditional invoice approval feature:

    • The software displayed a generic "Request not valid" error message when the model state was invalid, failing to provide specific feedback on why the request failed validation.

    • A workflow's 'No' phase was deleted when the phase following it was deleted.

  • When a P.O. number and a cost centre number were required on an invoice and then populated, the 'approve' button failed to appear.

  • A user who tried to use the 'Edit with Word Online' feature without a Microsoft 365 business account saw an' internal error' message that didn't explain why the feature wasn't available when using a personal account.

  • When one LSP user tried to add members to a conversation, they couldn't select an organization or add members and saw a "you've been removed from private conversation" message.

  • During functional testing, the wrong user appeared in an invoice history.

  • For a user in one organization, the 'approval status' column in Spend>Invoices wasn't filtering properly.

  • When the execution date for a contract was selected, the date picker field displayed the previous day's date.

  • Users were prompted to enter the execution date when a contract was sent for signing.

  • A client at one organization saw a 'profile not found' message when they tried to access an LSP's profile info.

  • When the 'newmatter' email address was used to create matters, the 'Objectives' field was truncated.

  • During regression testing, when a document was signed in DocuSign, the signature didn't appear.

  • During functional testing of the Workspace Intelligence feature:

    • It didn't accurately retrieve or display contract details, preventing the user from getting correct responses to their queries.

    • When a contract had no team assigned to it, and the user asked about the team assigned to it, WI responded with a hallucinated team name. It did the same when asked about the contract's owner and provided the contract group when asked about the contract type.

    • Conversation ID numbers appeared in response messages.

    • There was no response when the user opened a contract and asked, "Are there any related items?" in their prompt.

  • During functional testing of the email grid view, moving email threads between folders did not function correctly due to a discrepancy between file IDs. This caused the move operation to fail silently, without any error message or conflict resolution prompt. As a temporary workaround, the ability to move emails from the Email view was disabled until a permanent fix could be implemented.

  • The conditional logic applied to the "Matter due date" date picker field in LawVu's Outlook V3 add-in was not functioning as intended.

438.1

  • Core pipeline failure prevented deployment of WI search alerts.

Did this answer your question?