Skip to main content

LABELING and MARKETING COMPLIANCE GUIDELINE

W
Written by William Oliver

Below are twelve phrases and claim patterns that appear repeatedly in FDA warning letters issued to dietary supplement companies. These are high-risk because they either explicitly reference disease or strongly imply treatment of a disease condition. The table also includes safer structure/function alternatives that companies commonly use to stay within DSHEA and 21 CFR 101.93.

These examples are useful when screening labels, websites, Amazon listings, and social media marketing before approving production. This is not a comprehensive list of compliant and non-compliant language. It is only to be used as examples.


What is a “Disease”

Under FDA regulations (21 CFR 101.93(g)), a disease is defined as:

Damage to an organ, part, structure, or system of the body such that it does not function properly, or a state of health leading to such dysfunction.

Diseases typically require medical diagnosis or treatment.

Examples of Diseases

• Diabetes

• Hypertension (high blood pressure)

• Cancer

• Arthritis

• Depression

• Alzheimer’s disease

• Heart disease

• Osteoporosis

Examples of Non-Disease Conditions Often Used in Structure/Function Claims

• Occasional sleeplessness

• Temporary fatigue

• Mild stress

• Occasional digestive discomfort

• General wellness support

NOTE: It is important to note that regulatory compliance is not secured by using a few “magic words” or by avoiding some triggering terms. The overall message implied by the label and marketing language will be used by regulators to determine compliance.


Common High-Risk Supplement Claims and Compliant Alternatives

High-Risk Phrase / Claim Pattern

Why FDA Flags It

Safer Structure/Function Alternative

Lowers blood sugar

Implies diabetes treatment

Supports healthy glucose metabolism

Regulates blood sugar levels

Diabetes implication

Helps maintain healthy glucose levels already within the normal range

Lowers blood pressure

Hypertension treatment

Supports healthy blood pressure already within the normal range

Reduces inflammation

Disease-related inflammatory conditions

Supports a healthy inflammatory response

Detoxifies heavy metals

Drug-like detoxification claim

Supports the body’s natural detoxification processes

Treats anxiety

Mental health disease claim

Supports a calm and relaxed mood

Anti-depressant

Drug classification

Supports emotional well-being

Arthritis relief

Treatment of arthritis

Supports joint comfort and mobility

Burns fat / melts fat

Weight loss drug implication

Supports healthy weight management when combined with diet and exercise

Prevents heart disease

Disease prevention claim

Supports cardiovascular health

Anti-cancer / anti-tumor

Cancer treatment claim

Supports normal cellular health

Natural alternative to statins / insulin / antidepressants

Drug comparison claim

Supports healthy cholesterol metabolism or cardiovascular health


Why These Trigger FDA Enforcement

Most warning letters cite one or more of the following regulatory provisions:

FD&C Act Section 201(g)

Defines products intended to treat disease as drugs.

21 CFR 101.93(g)

Defines disease claims vs structure/function claims.

If a supplement is marketed with disease claims, it becomes:

  • An unapproved new drug

  • Misbranded under the FD&C Act


Phrases That Are Often Safe (When Used Correctly)

These terms generally fall within structure/function claim territory when properly qualified.

Examples regulators usually accept:

• Supports immune health

• Promotes healthy digestion

• Supports cognitive function

• Helps maintain healthy cholesterol levels already within the normal range

• Supports joint mobility

• Supports a healthy inflammatory response

• Promotes restful sleep

• Supports cardiovascular health

These must include the DSHEA disclaimer when used on labeling.


The “Biomarker Trap” (A Frequent Compliance Mistake)

Many marketers believe they are compliant when referencing biomarkers like:

  • blood sugar

  • cholesterol

  • blood pressure

  • cortisol

However, FDA frequently interprets these as disease claims if phrased improperly.

Example:

Claim

FDA Interpretation

Controls blood sugar

Diabetes claim

Supports healthy blood sugar already within the normal range

Usually acceptable

The phrase “already within the normal range” is often used to avoid implying disease treatment.


Highest-Risk Marketing Areas for Supplements

Claims involving the following topics receive the highest enforcement attention:

  1. Diabetes / blood sugar

  2. Weight loss

  3. Mental health

  4. Cancer

  5. Cardiovascular disease

  6. Hormones (testosterone, estrogen)

  7. Detox / heavy metals

Brands entering these categories should perform extra regulatory review before marketing.


Practical Guidance for Clients

Before submitting labels or marketing materials, clients should verify that claims:

• Do not reference diseases

• Do not imply drug-like treatment

• Do not compare supplements to prescription drugs

• Are supported by scientific evidence

When structure/function claims are used, labels must include the DSHEA disclaimer:

“These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.”


Did this answer your question?