Who is Realaml?
Only 1 of 2 ANZ firms with in-built biometric technogy
The world's only pay-per-use AML platform for legal professionals
Not just an AML/KYC tool but offer
Pride ourselves on value, support, innovation,
Our passive liveness partner ID R&D is globally ranked #1 by NIST.
Realaml is ISO and SOC 2. Passive liveiness technoligy is also iBeta 1 & 2 certified.
Likely Captured Law Firms Under AU Tranche 2 AML
Category | Likely Captured Under AU Tranche 2? |
Law firms with trust accounts | ✅ Yes – Handling client funds is a key AML risk |
Conveyancing / Property Lawyers | ✅ Yes – Involves high-value transactions |
Corporate / Business Lawyers | ✅ Yes – If assisting with company formation, trust setup, or structuring |
Estate Planning & Trust Lawyers | ✅ Yes – If managing trusts, acting as trustee, or handling client assets |
Litigation & Dispute Resolution Lawyers | ✅ Yes – If managing client funds or settlements |
Family Lawyers | ✅ Yes – If handling property settlements or financial arrangements |
Criminal Lawyers | ❌ No – Generally not handling client funds in transactions |
Employment Lawyers | ❌ No – Typically does not involve financial transactions |
In-house Counsel | ❌ No – Does not provide services to the public |
Barristers | ❌ No – Do not handle client funds |
Government Lawyers | ❌ No – Work for the government, not private clients |
Global Comparison of AML/CTF Regulations for Law Firms
This table compares AML/CTF obligations for law firms across Australia (Tranche 2 - 2026), New Zealand, UK (England & Scotland), Ireland, and South Africa.
Aspect | Australia (Tranche 2 - 2026) | New Zealand | UK (England & Scotland) | Ireland | South Africa |
Law Firms Covered? | ✅ Yes (from July 1, 2026) | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes (since 2007, expanded in 2017) | ✅ Yes (since 2010) | ✅ Yes (since 2001) |
Customer Due Diligence (CDD)? | ✅ Yes (from July 1, 2026) | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) for PEPs? | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
Ongoing Monitoring of Clients? | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs)? | ✅ Yes (to AUSTRAC) | ✅ Yes (to FIU) | ✅ Yes (to NCA) | ✅ Yes (to FIU) | ✅ Yes (to FIC) |
Threshold Transaction Reports (TTRs)? | ✅ Yes ($10,000+) | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (R25,000+) |
Independent Audits? | ✅ Yes (from 2026) | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
Risk-Based AML Programs? | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
Pre-Existing Clients Require CDD? | ✅ Yes (from July 1, 2026, risk-based) | ✅ Yes (risk-based) | ✅ Yes (risk-based) | ✅ Yes (risk-based) | ✅ Yes (risk-based) |
Regulator | AUSTRAC | DIA | SRA / LSRA / Law Society of Scotland | Law Society of Ireland | FIC (Financial Intelligence Centre) |
Date of Coverage for Law Firms? | From July 1, 2026 | Since 2018 | Since 2007 (Strengthened in 2017) | Since 2010 | Since 2001 |
Key Takeaways:
UK & Ireland: Have had Tranche 2-style laws for over a decade, with AML obligations embedded in legal practice rules.
New Zealand: Implemented AML/CTF for law firms in 2018, under Phase 2 of its AML Act.
South Africa: Has regulated law firms since 2001, with strict FIC oversight.
Australia: Catching up in 2026—law firms must enrol by July 29, 2026 and comply with full obligations from July 1, 2026.
Most law firms handling client funds and financial transactions are expected to be captured under AU Tranche 2 AML obligations. This includes firms engaged in conveyancing, trust management, and other high-risk legal services.
Final exemptions will be clarified in mid-2025, along with AUSTRAC’s official guidance on compliance requirements.
ARNECC vs Tranche 2
Requirement | ARNECC VOI* | Tranche 2 CDD |
Primary Focus | Verification of Identity (VOI) for property transactions | Customer Due Diligence (CDD) for AML/CTF compliance |
Regulatory Body | ARNECC (state-based) | AUSTRAC (federal) |
Primary Verification Method | Face-to-face with a legally authorized Identity Agent* | Remote or face-to-face, using risk-based measures |
Remote Verification | Allowed* if face-to-face is not possible due to remoteness | Always permitted with risk mitigation |
Who It Applies To | Lawyers, conveyancers, mortgagees involved in property transactions | Lawyers, accountants, real estate agents, and other designated professions under Tranche 2 AML |
Identity Documents Required | Set categories based on Model Participation Rules (MPR) | Risk-based approach, identity must be verified per AML/CTF standards |
* ARNECC VOI permits remote verification in cases where face-to-face is not possible, provided additional steps are taken to verify identity.
Step 1.
1. Establish an AML/CTF program
ML/TF/PF risk assessment
e.g. the type of work you conduct and the types of clients you deal withAML/CTF policies
2. Appoint an AML/CTF Compliance Office
Usually an employee within your firm.
Caveats To Consider
Services | Should the Same Vendor Do It? |
Establishing AML/CTF Compliance Program & Staff Training | ✅ Yes, same vendor allowed |
AML/CTF Independent Audit & Compliance Program Setup | ❌ No, independence required |
AML/CTF Independent Audit & Staff Training | ❌ No, independence required |
Enrol in AUSTRAC
If you are providing other newly regulated designated services, the new laws commence on 1 July 2026, and you must enrol by 29 July 2026.
Summary of Key Dates
Date | Requirement |
March 31, 2026 | Risk assessment & AML/CTF compliance policy must be completed. |
July 1, 2026 | Tranche 2 AML/CTF obligations fully in effect & enforced by AUSTRAC. |