Skip to main content

Text Detection

How Reality Defender’s text detector works, where it excels, and the known limitations (e.g., short inputs, mixed human/AI text, and heavy domain jargon). Includes coverage across LLMs and how to interpret borderline or tricky results.

Emily Essig avatar
Written by Emily Essig
Updated over 3 weeks ago

How does Reality Defender detect generative text?

Reality Defender’s text detector identifies AI-generated text by learning from large sets of paired human-written and model-generated examples. The detector processes the entire text as a whole and maps it into a high-dimensional vector space, enabling it to identify subtle statistical patterns that correlate with LLM-generated content.

This approach allows the model to detect signals that humans typically can’t perceive, such as distributional patterns, phrasing consistency, and token-level likelihood signatures, and resulting in highly accurate and robust predictions.


What LLMs are supported by Reality Defender’s Text Detection?

Text detection is platform-agnostic, meaning it supports virtually all LLMs that produce English-language text.

This includes:

  • Closed-source models: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity models, etc.

  • Open-source models: LLaMA variants, Mistral, Mixtral, Falcon, etc.

  • Consumer tool outputs: Bard, Bing Copilot, GitHub Copilot text, character/roleplay generators.

  • Obscure or lesser-known LLMs: In most cases, detection still works due to broad generalization capabilities.

    If an LLM can produce readable English text, RD can likely detect it.


How is AI-generated text created?

Large Language Models (LLMs) generate text one token at a time by predicting the next most likely word or character based on massive training datasets. This process enables them to:

  • Learn grammar, structure, and writing style

  • Memorize or generalize facts

  • Produce fluent, human-like prose

  • Adapt tone and format

Because the generation process relies on statistical prediction, these patterns, even when extremely subtle, can be distinguishable from human writing.

Did this answer your question?