Skip to main content

What Our AssetIQ - Meta Health Assessment Checks: 4 Pillars & 40+ Signals

Breakdown of the four pillars in a AssetIQ - Meta Health Assessment and examples of the 40+ backend restriction types we track

Written by Josh Richards
Updated over 5 months ago

Overview

When we say “Meta Health Assessment”, we don’t just mean “do you have a restriction or not?”. We scan four pillars with 40+ individual signals.

Here’s how we frame it internally so you know what we actually look for.


Pillar 1 – Asset trust & reputation (HiVA Tiers)

We infer how trusted each major asset is:

  • Core Business Managers

  • Active Ad Accounts

  • Main advertising Pages

  • Sometimes key domains/pixels

Example signals:

  • Low HiVA Tier / degraded trust tier

  • Security-score concerns

  • Trust drag caused by shared/legacy assets

How this shows up:

  • Higher CPM vs similar accounts

  • More friction, Learning Limited, and fragile scaling


Pillar 2 – Penalties, enforcement & risk

We look for patterns that match quiet enforcement:

  • Repeated generic rejections

  • Slow, sticky reviews

  • Invisible spend ceilings

  • Campaigns that “hit a wall” at certain budgets

Example signals:

  • ACE Warning (Asset Compliance Escalation)

  • DMCA/IP complaints

  • Engagement Abuse flags

  • Structural Invalidations and misuse patterns

These don’t always display as big red banners, but they change how Meta treats your spend.


Pillar 3 – Customer experience & reputation (Feedback & CX)

We analyse your reputation from the user’s point of view:

  • Facebook Feedback Score bands

  • Negative Feedback density (hides, reports, complaints)

  • Refund / chargeback behaviour

  • Compliance reputation history

Example signals:

  • Negative Feedback / low experience ratings

  • Feedback Score sitting near/under key thresholds

  • Reputation-driven disable events

These signals make you pay a CPM tax and reduce delivery priority even when ads are technically “good”.


Pillar 4 – Signals & delivery health (data & structure)

We check whether Meta has a clean, strong signal to optimise from:

  • Pixel + CAPI implementation

  • Event Match Quality and mapping

  • AEM configuration and change history

  • Budget vs audience sizing (Budget Mismatch)

  • Delivery health: reach, volatility, auction competitiveness

Example signals:

  • Payment Restriction or recurring billing issues

  • Weak or noisy conversion signals

  • Structural inefficiencies that cause poor learning


Why we show pillars, not just a list of problems

Your performance is almost never ruined by a single flag. It’s usually a stack:

  • Slightly low trust tier

  • Some ACE-style friction

  • Feedback pressure from a bad shipping season

  • A few signal/structure issues

By grouping signals into these four pillars, your report makes it clear:

  • What’s hurting you most

  • What you can safely ignore for now

  • What to fix first for CPM, stability and scale

Did this answer your question?