The guide below simplifies minute-by-minute cognitive metrics. If this is all the detail you need, download the chart below. However, for a deeper understanding, feel free to continue reading.

📥 Download the chart here.

Imagine you’re reviewing a season’s worth of training data. On the surface, everything looks great: the numbers are steady, and it seems like your athletes are on the right track. But what if I told you that these averages might be hiding the real story? This is where mean metrics can mislead us. They smooth out the highs and lows, giving us a comforting but incomplete picture. Like a coach who only sees the game from a bird’s-eye view, mean metrics don’t catch the crucial moments – the split-second decisions, the brief lapses in focus, or the sudden surges of brilliance. That’s why, for a truly comprehensive training strategy, we need more than just averages. We need the nitty-gritty, the play-by-play, the minute-by-minute data.

Minute on Minute (MoM) data is like having a high-definition camera zooming into every minute of your athletes’ performance. MoM doesn’t just skim the surface like average data. Instead, it dives deep, capturing every ebb and flow in cognitive and physiological metrics, minute by minute. This approach is like switching from a general synopsis to a detailed, moment-by-moment narrative of an athlete’s performance journey. By using MoM, we can spot things like a mid-task dip in Heart Rate Variability (HRV), which could mean an athlete is grappling with cognitive overload. Or maybe we see fluctuations in reaction times, pointing to potential fatigue. It’s this level of detail that transforms MoM from a mere feature into a cornerstone of insightful, nuanced athlete analysis.

Keep reading for detailed insights into each measure.

Reaction Time

Reaction Time serves as a critical measure of cognitive responsiveness. An increase in reaction time might signal growing fatigue or a conscious shift towards valuing accuracy more highly than speed. On the flip side, a decrease suggests the task may be too easy or the athlete is becoming more adept. Fluctuations in reaction time reveal inconsistency, highlighting potential issues with focus or task variability. A stable reaction time, however, could indicate that the workload has become routine or that the athlete has fully adapted to the challenge.

Speed normalizes reaction time, with increases suggesting either task ease or athlete adaptation. Fluctuating speed indicates performance inconsistency, while decreases may signal fatigue or a shift towards accuracy. Stable speed implies either a routine workload or full adaptation, indicating the athlete has effectively met the challenge.

Variation measures performance consistency. An increase in variation might indicate growing fatigue, making the athlete's performance less predictable. Fluctuating variation points to inconsistency, potentially from mental fatigue or increased effort. A decrease in variation could suggest the task is too easy or that adaptation has taken place. Stable variation indicates the workload matches the athlete's capabilities, yet continuous monitoring is crucial for sustained improvement.

Accuracy is the cornerstone of performance, highlighting the precision of responses. Improved accuracy signals potentially unchallenging tasks or successful adaptation, whereas decreasing accuracy points to increased fatigue, possibly requiring task adjustment or rest. Fluctuating accuracy underscores performance inconsistency, which could stem from varying levels of difficulty or engagement. Stability in accuracy may suggest an appropriate level of challenge or adaptation, meriting a deeper dive into other metrics for a fuller performance picture.

RCS represents the pinnacle of efficiency, balancing speed and accuracy in cognitive responses. An increase in RCS indicates not only quicker but also more precise responses. However, caution is advised if variability increases, as it might negate the benefits of faster and more accurate performance. A drop in RCS calls for a focus on improving accuracy and reviewing reaction time to identify potential slowdowns aimed at enhancing precision. When RCS remains unchanged, scrutinizing variability becomes crucial. A steady RCS suggests either a routine workload or full adaptation, indicating the athlete has effectively met the challenge.

To effectively analyze cognitive performance, it's crucial to dive deeper than just surface-level metrics. Whether metrics are increasing, decreasing, fluctuating, or stable, each change provides essential insights for optimizing training and performance.

​
​