Skip to main content

Baseline Analysis

Updated this week

Understanding how your athlete responds to cognitive training is key to refining performance strategies. While many metrics are available, we focus on the Big Three:

  • Reaction Time

  • Variation

  • Accuracy

These are the most important indicators when evaluating progress.

Why You Should Assess Them Together

These metrics should always be evaluated as a group—not in isolation—because they are deeply interconnected. Improvements in one area often influence the others, and progress across all three provides a clearer picture of true adaptation.

To confirm that the athlete is responding effectively to the current training load, each of the three metrics must improve by at least 5 percent. A combined average of 5 percent across all three is not enough—all three must individually reach or exceed the 5 percent threshold.

What to Do When the Big Three Improve (Over 5%)

  • Introduce new tasks that specifically target the cognitive demands you’re focusing on.

  • Increase the intensity and duration of current tasks to drive further adaptation.

  • Customize new or existing tasks: increase the intensity, duration, or both—or apply specialized training modes to raise the overall cognitive load.

What to Do When There’s Little or No Improvement (Under 5%)

  • Reuse the current tasks to give the athlete another opportunity to meet the challenge.

  • Adjust the task variables by:

    • Increasing the intensity

    • Extending the duration

    • Applying specialized training modes to create a more targeted cognitive load

If certain tasks didn’t perform well, look for a pattern. Are the low-performing tasks all targeting the same cognitive demand, or is the difficulty spread across multiple areas? Even if the overall baseline shows solid improvement, dig deeper. Which specific tasks underperformed — and what cognitive demand were they stressing? That’s where the next phase of training should focus.

Did this answer your question?