Skip to main content

How is the Casper test scored and evaluated?

Understanding how the Casper test is scored

Updated today

Each applicant’s Casper test is evaluated using both their typed and video responses. These are combined into a single overall score, which is then distributed to the programs the applicant has added to their distribution list. Once the test has started, all sections must be completed.

How responses are evaluated

Each section (scenario) contains two separate questions. Both questions within a scenario are reviewed by the same rater, who can see the full scenario context. However, each question is scored independently.

This means:

  • Scores are assigned at the individual question level, not as one score for the whole scenario.

  • The final Casper score is calculated based on all individual question scores across the test.


How your responses are handled

Your responses are anonymized before being evaluated. Raters do not see any personal information such as your name, age, or photo, only your typed or video responses are presented to them.


Scoring methodology

Each rater is assigned a specific scenario and is given all necessary background knowledge and instructions relevant to the topic at hand. Raters are then presented with multiple responses from different applicants related to that single scenario. Importantly, no rater scores an applicant more than once, ensuring unbiased evaluation.

Raters are instructed to focus on the substance and quality of your response rather than factors issues like grammar or spelling. Their goal is to assess your thought process, judgment, and communication.


Score calculation and standardization

Once all responses are evaluated, the individual ratings are averaged. The resulting scores are standardized to represent the relative rankings of each applicant compared to the applicant pool.


Rater training

All raters must complete a comprehensive training program and receive accreditation before they are allowed to score responses. This helps ensure consistent and high-quality evaluations.

Did this answer your question?