Skip to main content

Check-ins and appraisals: how they work and who sees what

The two check-in types, the one-to-one lifecycle, and the reveal rules that decide when each side sees the other's answers.

Check-ins are how managers and employees hold a structured conversation in All Gravy. The part worth understanding before you set them up is the reveal rules, because they decide who sees what and when. 💬


Two types

  • A freeform note. A simple record of a conversation. One side writes, and it is saved against the employee.

  • A structured one-to-one. Both manager and employee answer the same template before meeting, then agree an outcome.


The one-to-one lifecycle

A structured check-in moves through four states, in order:

  1. Awaiting both to prepare — neither side has answered yet

  2. Awaiting one side's preparation — one has answered, the other has not

  3. Awaiting outcome — both have answered, the conversation still needs a result recorded

  4. Complete


Reveal rules — read this before you build a template

Each template sets a reveal rule, and it governs when each side can see what the other wrote:

  • Immediate — answers are visible as soon as they are submitted

  • Mutual — answers unlock only once both sides have submitted. This stops one person anchoring on the other's answer

  • Private — answers are not shared with the other side

Mutual is the usual choice for appraisals. Private suits anything where candour matters more than discussion.


Approval flows

Where a check-in needs sign-off, it routes through the same approval flows used elsewhere in All Gravy: conditions on type, an approver by person or by role, and multi-step approval as any-one, all, or sequential.


💬 Check-ins are flag-gated. If you cannot see them, chat with us and we will confirm what is enabled on your account. 🙏

Did this answer your question?