Skip to main content

Troubleshooting Data Differences Between Polar and Your Ad Platform

Troubleshooting Data Differences Between Polar and Your Ad Platforms

Louise avatar
Written by Louise
Updated over a week ago

Overview

When comparing metrics in Polar to those shown directly in your ad platforms (like Meta, Google, TikTok, or others), it’s common to notice discrepancies. While this can be confusing or concerning at first glance, these differences are usually expected and explainable.

This article explains why data discrepancies happen, which checks to run first, and how to confidently validate your numbers in Polar. By the end, you’ll know how to identify the root cause of mismatches and ensure you’re making decisions based on accurate, aligned data.

In this article, we’ll cover:

  • The most common reasons Polar and ad platforms don’t match

  • How attribution logic impacts reported performance

  • Step-by-step troubleshooting checks you can apply immediately


Section 1: Understand Why Data Discrepancies Are Normal

Before diving into troubleshooting, it’s important to understand that Polar and ad platforms are built for different purposes, which directly affects how data is collected and reported.

Key reasons discrepancies occur

1. Different attribution models
Ad platforms typically use their own attribution windows (e.g. Facebook's 7-day click, 1-day view), while Polar uses a single, consistent attribution model across all channels. This means:

  • Ad platforms may over-attribute conversions to themselves

  • Polar prioritizes cross-channel consistency and deduplication

2. Different event definitions
Metrics like “purchases,” “conversions,” or “revenue” may not be defined the same way:

  • Ad platforms often include modeled or estimated conversions

  • Polar relies on actual tracked events from your ecommerce platform

3. Timing and timezone differences
Data can shift depending on:

  • The timezone set in your ad platform vs. Polar

  • When conversions are recorded (click time vs. purchase time)

💡 Important: A discrepancy does not automatically mean something is broken. In many cases, it means Polar is showing a more conservative, reality-based view of performance.


Section 2: Check Your Core Configuration First

Most unexpected data gaps can be traced back to configuration mismatches. Before investigating deeper, run through these foundational checks.

1. Confirm date ranges and timezones

Make sure you’re comparing:

  • The same date range

  • The same timezone across Polar and the ad platform

Even a small timezone offset can shift conversions into a different day.

2. Validate your integrations

Check that:

  • The ad platform integration is connected and active

  • Your ecommerce platform (Shopify, etc.) is fully synced

  • There are no recent disconnects or sync errors

If an integration was paused or reconnected recently, partial data for that period is expected.

3. Compare the right metrics

Ensure you’re aligning equivalent metrics:

  • Revenue vs. conversion value

  • Purchases vs. conversions

  • Click-through conversions vs. total conversions

Avoid comparing modeled metrics in ad platforms with raw metrics in Polar.


Section 3: Understand Attribution & Deduplication in Polar

One of Polar’s biggest strengths is its cross-channel attribution logic, which can make numbers look lower — but more accurate.

How Polar handles attribution

  • Each order is attributed once, even if multiple channels were involved

  • Polar removes double-counting that can happen when multiple ad platforms claim the same conversion

  • This often results in lower (but cleaner) numbers compared to ad platform dashboards

What this means for your analysis

  • Expect Polar totals to be lower than the sum of all ad platforms

  • Use Polar as your source of truth for blended performance

  • Use ad platforms primarily for in-platform optimization, not total revenue reporting

💡 If Polar exactly matched every ad platform, it would mean conversions were being double-counted.


Section 4: When to Investigate Further (and When Not To)

Normal and expected differences

You usually don’t need to worry if:

  • Discrepancies are within a reasonable range

  • Trends over time move in the same direction

  • Polar data aligns closely with your ecommerce backend

Red flags worth investigating

Dig deeper or reach out to support if:

  • Entire days or channels show zero data

  • Differences are extreme or sudden

  • Revenue in Polar doesn’t align with your ecommerce platform at all

When contacting support, sharing screenshots, date ranges, and the exact metrics you’re comparing will help resolve issues faster.


Conclusion

Data discrepancies between Polar and ad platforms are common, expected, and usually healthy. They’re a result of different attribution models, event definitions, and the deduplication logic that makes Polar a reliable source of truth.

Key takeaways:

  • Always align date ranges, timezones, and metrics first

  • Expect ad platforms to over-report compared to Polar

  • Trust Polar for cross-channel, decision-making insights

  • Use ad platforms for tactical, channel-specific optimization

By understanding why differences exist, you can move forward with confidence and focus on optimizing performance — not reconciling numbers.

Did this answer your question?