Answer
Use the ANVL Scores report to understand both how much work is being completed and how well it is being completed. This report helps you identify where adoption is strong, where workflow quality is weak, and where coaching or support may be needed.
It is especially useful for EHS leaders, Program Leads, supervisors, and site leaders because it combines participation and quality into one reporting view.
The report includes three main scores:
Percent to Goal — shows how close users, teams, or sites are to meeting expected workflow volume
Strength Score — shows workflow completion quality
Power Score — combines completion and quality into one score to help prioritize attention
A simple way to think about them:
Percent to Goal answers: Are people doing the work?
Strength Score answers: Are workflows being done well?
Power Score answers: Where should we focus first?
Steps
Open the ANVL Power BI reports.
Open the ANVL Scores page.
Apply filters as needed, such as:
User
Supervisor
Job Title
Group / site
time period such as week, month, or quarter
Review Percent to Goal.
This measures how close a user, team, or site is to meeting the expected workflow target.
It is based on the goals set for the program.
Example: 5 JSAs per user per week
Review Strength Score.
This measures workflow completion quality, not just volume.
It may include factors such as:
photos added
hazards identified
time spent
required fields completed
Higher scores generally indicate more complete, thoughtful workflows.
Review Power Score.
This combines Percent to Goal and Strength Score into one score.
The default weighting is often 50 / 50
Weighting can be adjusted in some programs if needed
Use the tables and heat maps to identify patterns.
Look for:
high performers
low adoption
strong completion but weak quality
good quality but low completion
This helps you identify where support or follow-up is most needed
Review score trends over time.
Use the trend views to see whether performance is improving or declining
Compare teams, supervisors, or sites across different time periods
Use the heat maps to focus attention.
Heat maps make it easier to spot where results are strongest or weakest
This is useful for finding adoption gaps, coaching opportunities, or inconsistent performance
Export the data if needed.
Export tables or visuals to Excel
Use this when you need deeper analysis or want to share results outside Power BI
Use the report to guide action.
Focus first on users, teams, or sites with low Power Score
Then review whether the issue is:
low completion
low quality
or both
Additional details
Use Power Score as a leading indicator, not a punitive metric.
This report works best when used for coaching, enablement, and follow-up.
Review trends over time instead of relying only on one snapshot.
If you need to understand why scores are low, pair this report with Workflow Drilldown, Escalations & Actions, or Open Text Analysis.