Skip to main content

Feedback Style Options in CoGrader

How each feedback style supports different teaching goals and student needs.

Gabriel Chi avatar
Written by Gabriel Chi
Updated over 2 weeks ago

Feedback works best when its structure matches your teaching goals. CoGrader offers multiple feedback styles so you can choose how students receive guidance, whether you’re focusing on confidence, revision, reflection, or rubric mastery.

You can select a feedback style when setting up an assignment and change it later, even after grading has begun.

Choosing a Feedback Style

When creating or editing an assignment, you’ll see the Feedback style section. Each option organizes feedback differently, but all align with your rubric and grading parameters.

Feedback Style Options

Standard (Summary & Rubric Only) 📋

Structure

  • Overall feedback summary

  • Rubric scores and rubric-aligned comments

Best for

  • Summative or benchmark assessments

  • High-stakes writing

  • Situations where clarity and efficiency matter most

Why teachers choose it
This format keeps feedback tightly aligned to the rubric, with minimal coaching language. It works well when students already understand expectations.

Glow, Grow, Think about it ✨🌱💭

Structure

  • Glow: What the student did well

  • Grow: What to work on next

  • Think About It: A reflective prompt that helps the student connect strengths to next steps

Best for

  • Formative assessment

  • Growth-focused classrooms

  • Upper elementary through high school

Why teachers choose it
“Grow” frames improvement as a next step, not a weakness, which keeps students open to revision.

Two Stars and a Wish ⭐️⭐️🎯

Structure

  • Two strengths (stars)

  • One improvement goal (wish)

Best for

  • Elementary and middle school

  • Peer review

  • Building confidence while introducing critique

Why teachers choose it
The 2:1 positive balance reinforces strengths before addressing growth, and the “wish” language keeps feedback encouraging.

Rose, Bud, Thorn 🌹🌱🥀

Structure

  • Rose: A success or highlight

  • Bud: An area of emerging potential

  • Thorn: A challenge or difficulty

Best for

  • Project-based learning

  • Creative and design-focused assignments

  • Reflection activities

Why teachers choose it
The “bud” emphasizes future potential, supporting a growth mindset rather than focusing only on current gaps.

WWW / EBI (What Went Well / Even Better If) ✅✨

Structure

  • What Went Well

  • Even Better If

Best for

  • Formative assessment

  • Any setting where tone matters

Why teachers choose it
“Even Better If” keeps suggestions constructive and nonjudgmental, which helps students engage with feedback instead of resisting it.

TAG (Tell, Ask, Give) 🗣️❓🎁

Structure

  • Tell something done well

  • Ask a clarifying or probing question

  • Give a suggestion for improvement

Best for

  • Peer review

  • Discussion-based classes

  • Teaching students how to evaluate work

Why teachers choose it
The question invites reflection and dialogue, helping students internalize criteria rather than passively receiving feedback.

3-2-1 Feedback 🔢🧠

Structure

  • 3 things done well

  • 2 areas to improve

  • 1 strongest takeaway

Best for

  • Presentations

  • Oral assessments

  • Performances and demonstrations

Why teachers choose it
Ending with the strongest positive helps students remember what matters most while still receiving actionable guidance.

PQP (Praise, Question, Polish) 👏❓✨

Structure

  • Praise: Specific strengths

  • Question: Clarification or curiosity

  • Polish: Refinement suggestions

Best for

  • Writing workshops

  • Drafting and revision cycles

  • Peer editing

Why teachers choose it
“Polish” frames revisions as refinement, which fits naturally into writing instruction.

Changing Feedback Style After Grading

You’re not locked into a feedback format once grading begins. CoGrader lets you change the feedback style after a round of grading and regenerate feedback using the new structure.

This is useful if you:

  • Realize that a different format fits the assignment better

  • Want to shift tone for revisions

  • Move from summative feedback to coaching feedback

Change Feedback Style from the Assignment Page

You can update the feedback style directly from the assignment view.

Steps

  1. Open the assignment.

  2. Locate the Feedback style next to the rubric and grading parameters.

  3. Click the pencil icon.

  4. Select a new feedback style.

  5. Save your changes.

Change Feedback Style Within a Student Submission

You can also change the feedback style while reviewing an individual student’s work.

Steps

  1. Open a student submission.

  2. In the right-hand Customization panel, find Feedback style.

  3. Click the pencil icon.

  4. Choose a new format.

  5. Regenerate or edit feedback as needed before approving.

What Changes

When you change the feedback style:

  • The structure of feedback updates to match the new format.

  • You can still revise feedback manually or with AI support before approval.

This flexibility lets you adapt feedback as students’ needs become clearer.

Tips for Choosing the Right Feedback Style

Many teachers switch styles based on:

  • Student age and confidence level

  • Assignment purpose

  • Formative vs. summative goals

  • Whether revision or reflection is expected

You can adjust feedback style per assignment, so your feedback stays aligned with how and why students are learning.

Did this answer your question?